(2018) 1 Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr. 5–14
https://doi.org/10.34285/visnyknapu2018.53.005
Title of the article	Theoretical Issues for Formation and Approval of the Modern Administrative and Processual Competence of the Prosecutor of Ukraine
Author(s)	VALERII KARPUNTSOV PhD in Law, People’s Deputy of Ukraine
Short title of the journal (ISSN)	Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr.
Year	2018
Issue	1
Pages	[5–14]
Language	Ukrainian
Abstract	The article deals with the important theoretical questions of the formation and approval of modem administrative-procedural competence of the Prosecutor’s Office in Ukraine. The emphasis is placed on the fact that proper legal procedure is related to the rule of law as an administrative procedural form and the basis of legality. It is concluded that the powers of prosecutors to appeal should be unified in the Ukrainian procedural codes, taking into account both the equality of rights of the parties to the process, and the special role of the prosecutor in ensuring the rule of law, as well as the unity and centralization of the prosecution system.
Keywords	administrative-procedural competence of the prosecutor’s offices; theory of competence; powers of the prosecutor’s office; powers of authority; subjects of jurisdiction.
References	REFERENCES 1. Anpilohov O.V. Zakhyst prav ta svobod hromadianyna prokurorom v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi: monohr. [Protection of the Rights and Freedoms of a Citizen by a Prosecutor in Administrative Proceedings: monogr.]. Kyiv: In Iure,2008. 168 p. (in Ukrainian). 2. Tertyshnyk V. Kontseptualni aspekty prokurorskoho nahliadu [Conceptual Aspects of Prosecutorial Supervision]. Visnyk prokuratury. 2002. № 6(18). P. 14–19 (in Ukrainian). 3. Trofymenko V.M. Teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy dyferentsiatsii protsesualnoi formy u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi: monohr. [Theoretical and Legal Basis of Differentiation of Procedural Form in Criminal Proceedings: monogr.]. Kharkiv: Oberih, 2016. 304 p. (in Ukrainian). 4. Lapkin A.V. Sudove pravo Ukrainy: navch. posib. u skhemakh [Judicial Law of Ukraine: teach. manual in the schemes]. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2017. 150 p. (in Ukrainian). 5. Pysarenko N.B. Do pytannia pro sutnist administratyvnoho protsesu [The Question of the Essence of the Administrative Process]. Zhurnal skhidnoievropeiskoho prava. 2015. № 13. P. 141–145 (in Ukrainian). 6. Sakara N. Problema dostupnosti pravosuddia u tsyvilnykh spravakh [The Problem of Access to Justice in Civil Matters]. Pravo Ukrainy. 2004. № 1. P. 105–109 (in Ukrainian). 7. Barishpol’skaja T.Ju. Grazhdanskie process i procedura (ponjatie, sluzhebnaja rol’, problemy teorii i praktiki) [Civil Process and Procedure (Concept, Service Role, Problems of Theory and Practice)] (avtoref. diss. na soiskanie uchen. stepeni kand. jurid. nauk). Tomsk, 1988. 21 p. (in Russian). 8. Tsyhaniuk Yu.V. “Nalezhna pravova protsedura” yak systemna pravova katehoriia vitchyznianoho kryminalnoho protsesu [“Proper Legal Procedure” as a System Legal Category of the Domestic Criminal Process]. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo. 2014. № 3. P. 217–219 (in Ukrainian). 9. Shliakhtun P.P. Konstytutsiine pravo: slovnyk terminiv [Constitutional Law: glossary of terms]. Kyiv: Lybid, 2005. 568 p. (in Ukrainian). 10. Tihomirov Ju.A. Teorija kompetencii [Competence Theory]. М., 2001. 335 p. (in Russian). 11. Kuznecov I.N. Kompetencija vysshih organov vlasti i upravlenija v SSSR [Competence of the highest authorities in the USSR]. M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1969. 244 p. (in Russian). 12. Sheremet K.F. Voprosy kompetencii mestnyh sovetov [Competency Issues of Local Councils]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1976. № 4. P. 17–28 (in Russian). 13. Matusovskyi H.A., Bodnianskyi Ye.V., Bushchan O.P., Bahynskyi V.Z., Horodyskyi O.M. Pravookhoronni orhany u borotbi z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu: kompetentsiia ta vzaiemodiia [Law Enforcement Agencies in the Fight against Organized Crime: Competence and Interaction]. Pytannia borotby zi zlochynnistiu. Kharkiv: Pravo, 1998. P. 22–23 (in Ukrainian). 14. Vengerov A.B. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: ucheb. dlja juridicheskih vuzov [Theory of State and Law: textbook for law schools]. M.: Jurisprudencija, 1999. 528 p. (in Russian). 15. Heorhiievskyi Yu.V. Kompetentsiia orhaniv publichnoi vlady: teoriia i praktyka zastosuvannia [Competence of Public Authorities: the Theory and Practice of Application]. Kyiv: Lohos, 2015. 345 p. (in Ukrainian). 16. Skakun O.F. Teoriia derzhavy i prava: pidruch. (entsyklopedychnyi kurs) [Theory of State and Law: textbook (encyclopedic course)]. Kharkiv: Espada, 2006. 776 p. (in Ukrainian). 17. Bytiak Yu.P., Harashchuk V.M., Diachenko O.V. ta in. Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: pidruch. [Administrative Law of Ukraine: textbook]. K.: Yurinkom Inter, 2007. 544 p. (in Ukrainian). 18. Kazanchuk I.D. Kompetentsiia orhaniv Natsionalnoi politsii Ukrainy shchodo okhorony navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha ta ekolohichnoi bezpeky v intehratsiinykh umovakh [Competence of Bodies of the National Police of Ukraine about Environmental Protection and Ecological Safety in the Integration Conditions]. Nashe pravo. 2017. № 1. P. 54–61 (in Ukrainian). 19. Melnyk R.S., Bevzenko V.M. Zahalne administratyvne pravo: navch. posib. [General Administrative Law: ttach. manual]. Kyiv: Vaite, 2014. 376 p. (in Ukrainian). 20. Grun A.Ja. Peresmotr prigovorov v porjadke sudebnogo nadzora [Judicial Review of Sentences]. M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1969. 160 p. (in Russian). 21. Andrushko O.V. Diznannia v orhanakh prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy: protsesualni ta orhanizatsiini aspekty [Inquiries in the Border Guard Service of Ukraine: Procedural and Organizational Aspects] (avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk). Kyiv, 2005. 20 p. (in Ukrainian). 22. Fedchenko V.M. Rozsliduvannia zlochyniv slidchoiu ta slidcho-operatyvnoiu hrupoiu: pravovi ta orhanizatsiini zasady [Investigation of Crime by Investigative and Investigative-Operative Group: Legal and Organizational Principles (avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk). Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy, 2005. 20 p. (in Ukrainian). 23. Chel’cov M.A. Sovetskij ugolovnyj process [Soviet Criminal Process]. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo juridicheskoj literatury, 1966. 624 p. (in Russian). 24. Bilodid I.M. Administratyvni povnovazhennia orhaniv prokuratury Ukrainy [Administrative Powers of the Prosecutor’s Offices of Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. 2015. Iss. 35. P. II. T. 2. P. 63–67. (Seriia “Pravo”) (in Ukrainian). 25. Bilodid I.M. Administratyvno-pravovyi status orhaniv prokuratury v umovakh reformuvannia pravookhoronnoi systemy [The Administrative and Legal Status of the Prosecutor’s Office in the Context of Reforming the Law-enforcement System] (avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk). Kharkiv, 2016. 22 p. (in Ukrainian). 26. Dolezhan V.V. Shliakhy konkretyzatsii predstavnytskoi funktsii prokuratury u maibutnomu Zakoni Ukrainy “Pro prokuraturu” [Ways of Specifying the Representative Function of Prosecutors in the Future Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutor’s Office”]. Problemy orhanizatsii prokuratury i optymizatsii yii diialnosti v suchasnykh umovakh: zb. nauk. Prats [Problems of Organization of the Prosecutor’s Office and Optimization of Its Activity in Modern Conditions: scien. works]. Kharkiv, 1998. P. 184–188 (in Ukrainian). 27. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy (zi zminamy i dopovnenniamy) [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine (with amendments and supplements)]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2005. № 35, 36, 37. Art. 446 (in Ukrainian). 28. Loboiko L.M. Kryminalno-protsesualna kompetentsiia: monohr. [Criminal-Procedural Competence: monogr.]. Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovskyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav, 2006. 188 p.